Sony FX3 vs Canon C70 – Side-by-Side Comparison - wickerlooris

Sony FX3 vs Canyon C70 – English-by-Slope Comparison

Two of the "hottest" cameras in 2022 are the Sony FX3 and the Canon Eos C70. Both are newer bundle cinema cameras that are relatively low-cost. Plus, they possess very groovy feature sets. Still will similar designs and form factors they have many really notable differences, and if you are shopping around for your close system several of these things can make a decision identical tough.

Film maker Armando Ferreira worked together with Gryphon Conway to put the FX3 and C70 up against one other in a side of meat-away-side comparison. IT's so difficult to compare cameras now since everything is so good. Each has certain strengths and weaknesses, so it is definitely worth checking unconscious.

Blueprint and Build

Sony went with Mg alloy for the FX3 and it feels solid. It besides shares a standardised form factor to the a7S Tierce, though with the EVF chopped murder, and is small and unimportant. Append a top handgrip with two full-size up XLR inputs and you have a very resourceful and durable rig.

Canyon opted for a strong plastic – exactly like what you would find happening a vocation DSLR. The C70 emulates a lot of that mirrorless/DSLR design and would compare all right to a camera with a battery grip. It's a littler bigger than the FX3 and ISN't quite A easy to hold because of it.

Generally, some Armando and Griffin agree that the C70 seems a little to a lesser extent durable than other offerings from Canon while the FX3 seems to be more than solid.

Image Superior

This might likewise be a connect. Both cameras are incredibly genuine. The only main difference would be the detector size if that is important to you. Sony packed a full-skeletal frame sensor into the FX3 while Canon stuck with a solid Super 35mm offering.

Internal recording is also well matched. Though, the FX3 does have a neat magic trick in being able to output peeled video over HDMI to an Atomos Ninja V. This buns make out in handy. Interestingly, the Dual Gain Output signal design of the C70's sensing element did seem to give information technology an edge up recovering shadows and highlights compared to the FX3.

Image Accredit: Atomos

Peerless other matter is that the FX3 is limited to UHD while the C70 has true DCI resolutions.

For color profiles, the FX3 came extinct with S-Cinetone, a ready-to-publish look-alike that tunes the colors to insure good skin tones, color, and contrast. The C70 doesn't have a similar visibility, but it does allow you to laden in custom LUTs and broil them in to your footage for great results.

Autofocus

A John R. Major shift in cinema cameras is forward-looking autofocus functionality. Both the C70 and FX3 have good systems. Canon's Dual Pixel AF tech has been very well received. However, the C70 seems to beryllium a touch less tried and true than other Canon Cinema offerings. The FX3 was much more reliable when it came to focusing and has more features, equal Eye AF. It's an interesting point that gives an edge to the FX3.

The C70 is still very good when properly exposed and its Face Only mode is intelligent for shot people.

Image Credit: Canyon

Stabilisation

This is very easily in Sony's pillar. The FX3 has in-body stabilization besides as the ability to disc gyro data to use Catalyst software to do extremely good digital stabilisation. Canon does have some in-body extremity stabilization that will crop in a scra more but provide a ready-to-edit register.

Compared side-by-side the FX3 wins KO'd with fitter results in both modes.

Final Notes

Both cameras have unique features the other doesn't: